How likely is it for $ETH to break through 4000 in the short term? Looking at the $ETH ETF, there was a net outflow of about -$465 million on August 4th (mainly ETHA), but on 8/5 there was an inflow of +$73.3 million and on 8/6 +$35.1 million, with inflows quickly turning positive. Additionally, it's worth noting that in the first two weeks of August, the net growth of ETH spot ETF holdings accounted for about 0.3–0.4% of the circulating supply. In fact, not only $BTC, but $ETH is also close to the bottom of exchange inventories. The general explanation is that selling pressure has decreased, but in reality, the price resistance for $ETH comes more from psychological barriers rather than actual sellable volume. Moreover, the significant benefits of the EIP-4844 upgrade have not yet reflected in the price of $ETH, but if it continues to hover around 3800 this weekend, we will basically have to look at the US CPI next week. This means that if pure capital flow and narrative fundamentals cannot help $ETH break through 4000, it will have to rely on macroeconomic and regulatory benefits to drive it.
Is $ETH ready for a crazy surge? To conclude: Currently, there is potential for a meme-like surge driven by funds, but it relies on continuous incremental funding and narrative reshaping. The conditions for an increase are in a rapid accumulation phase: - ETF funding channels are opening up - Regulatory pricing is gradually being established - High staking/re-staking leads to a tightening of circulating chips. Potential downward pressure is also on the rise: - Burning rate is decreasing - Net supply is re-inflating - L2 diversion leads to L1 fees and narrative dilution. Here’s a detailed interpretation: First, $ETH currently has a certain incremental demand: - Daily inflows of $700 million into U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs, with cumulative inflows in the tens of billions, show a trend of institutions and retail investors concentrating their positions through compliant channels. - Several listed companies are migrating or adding $ETH positions from Bitcoin reserves, with most CT bloggers comparing $ETH to the early $BTC corporate allocation craze. - The U.S. Congress is advancing several pieces of crypto legislation, boosting the risk premium across the entire digital asset category, facilitating institutional allocation. Secondly, there is a supply-side tightening and a decrease in circulation: - The staking ratio across the network has reached a historical high (around 28%-29%+), with circulating sellable chips continuously declining. - The re-staking ecosystem (EigenLayer @eigenlayer, etc.) is increasing TVL, absorbing additional circulating chips and adding derivative yields, enhancing holding willingness. - The corporate treasury model (BitMine, SharpLink, and others shifting to $ETH surplus allocation) further locks in liquidity. The only current flaw is that the ETH L1 ecosystem narrative is failing, with 85% of ecological transactions having migrated to L2 (Base taking the majority; L2 fees are profitable). Moreover, the success of L2 means scaled adoption, taking most of the traffic away from the L1 fee pool, leading to a decrease in L1 burning rate, resulting in net supply re-inflation/annual dilution rebound, and the deflationary effect of EIP-1559 cannot be automatically maintained. This means that the upward drive for ETH is similar to BTC, supported purely by short-term capital injections. If the funding cannot be sustained, $ETH will definitely encounter resistance, with the biggest catalyst being the staking ETF. If the staking ETF is approved, ETH is highly likely to surge to $4,000-$5,000 in the short term.
Show original
25.78K
41
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.