How likely is it for $ETH to break through 4000 in the short term?
Looking at the $ETH ETF, there was a net outflow of about -$465 million on August 4th (mainly ETHA), but on 8/5 there was an inflow of +$73.3 million and on 8/6 +$35.1 million, with inflows quickly turning positive.
Additionally, it's worth noting that in the first two weeks of August, the net growth of ETH spot ETF holdings accounted for about 0.3–0.4% of the circulating supply.
In fact, not only $BTC, but $ETH is also close to the bottom of exchange inventories. The general explanation is that selling pressure has decreased, but in reality, the price resistance for $ETH comes more from psychological barriers rather than actual sellable volume.
Moreover, the significant benefits of the EIP-4844 upgrade have not yet reflected in the price of $ETH, but if it continues to hover around 3800 this weekend, we will basically have to look at the US CPI next week. This means that if pure capital flow and narrative fundamentals cannot help $ETH break through 4000, it will have to rely on macroeconomic and regulatory benefits to drive it.
Is $ETH ready for a wild rise?
Let's start with the conclusion: There is currently a capital-driven skyrocketing potential similar to MEME, but it relies on continuous incremental funds and narrative reshaping
The rising conditions are in the stage of rapid accumulation:
ETF funding channels open
Regulatory pricing is gradually implemented
A high percentage of staking/re-staking has led to a tightening of tradable chips
The potential downward pressure is also on the rise:
The burn rate decreases
Net supply re-inflation
L2 offloading leads to L1 fees and narrative dilution
Here's a detailed interpretation:
The first is that $ETH now has some incremental demand
-The daily inflow of U.S. spot ether ETFs was in the order of $700 million in a single day, accumulating billions of dollars in inflows, and there was a trend of institutions and retail investors building positions through compliance channels
-Many listed companies have migrated or added $ETH positions from Bitcoin warehouses, and most CT bloggers have compared $ETH to the early $BTC corporate allocation boom
-The U.S. Congress has advanced several crypto legislation to boost the risk premium of the entire digital asset class, making it easier for institutions to increase allocation
The second is supply-side tightening and circulation decline
-The staking ratio of the entire network reached a record high (approximately 28%-29%+), and the circulating and saleable chips continued to decline
-The TVL of the re-pledge ecosystem (EigenLayer@eigenlayer, etc.) has increased, absorbing additional circulating chips and superimposing derivative income to enhance holding intentions
- Corporate treasury models (BitMine, SharpLink, others shifting to $ETH surplus allocation) further lock in liquidity
The only flaw at present is that the ETH L1 ecological narrative has failed, and 85% of ecological transactions have been migrated to L2 (Base accounts for the majority; L2 fee profit).
In addition, the success of L2 means large-scale adoption, taking most of the traffic away from the L1 fee pool, followed by a decrease in the L1 burn rate, leading to a reflation of net supply/annualized dilution recovery, and the deflationary effect of EIP-1559 cannot be automatically maintained.
This means that ETH's upward drive is similar to BTC, supported by purely short-term capital injections, and if funds cannot sustain $ETH, it will definitely encounter resistance, and the biggest catalyst lies in staking ETFs.
If the pledge ETF is approved, ETH has a high probability of rushing to $4,000-$5,000 in the short term.
26.73K
41
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.